Topical Guide/Book of Mormon/Textual Issues/Reformed Egyptian - Revision history

GregSmith: /* top */Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}}

2024-04-13T21:54:40Z

top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 13 April 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~FairMormon~~}}		{{Main Page}}
	{{Resources}}		{{Resources}}

FairMormonBot: Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles(.*)}} +)

2017-06-09T06:06:39Z

Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles(.*)}} +)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:06, 9 June 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{FairMormon}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}		{{FairMormon}}
	{{Resources}}		{{Resources}}

FairMormonBot: Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles FAIR copyright}} +{{FairMormon}})

2017-06-08T21:13:46Z

Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles FAIR copyright}} +{{FairMormon}})

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:13, 8 June 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~Articles FAIR copyright~~}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}		{{FairMormon}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
	{{Resources}}		{{Resources}}

RKMBot: Bot: Removing fr:Topical Guide/Book of Mormon/Textual Issues/Reformed Egyptian

2017-06-05T22:56:26Z

Bot: Removing fr:Topical Guide/Book of Mormon/Textual Issues/Reformed Egyptian

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:56, 5 June 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:
	\|summary=It is claimed that Egyptian would be too lengthy and bulky on the plates to account for the Book of Mormon [Egyptian would take] "perhaps four times, or even more than four times, as much room as the English, and it is quite certain that, as the Book of Mormon is 600 pages thick, it would take at least a thousand plates to hold in the Egyptian language, what is there written."		\|summary=It is claimed that Egyptian would be too lengthy and bulky on the plates to account for the Book of Mormon [Egyptian would take] "perhaps four times, or even more than four times, as much room as the English, and it is quite certain that, as the Book of Mormon is 600 pages thick, it would take at least a thousand plates to hold in the Egyptian language, what is there written."
	}}		}}

	~~[[fr:Topical Guide/Book of Mormon/Textual Issues/Reformed Egyptian]]~~

RogerNicholson: m

2013-11-29T00:52:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:52, 29 November 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\|link=Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Language/Reformed Egyptian		\|link=Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Language/Reformed Egyptian
	\|subject=Reformed Egyptian		\|subject=Reformed Egyptian
	\|summary=~~Critics~~ claim that Jews or Israelites (like the Nephites) would not have used the language of their slave period — Egyptian — to write sacred records, that there is no evidence in Egyptology of something called "reformed Egyptian," and that the Book of Mormon's claim to have been written in this language is therefore suspect. However, the claim that Israelites would not use Egyptian is clearly false. By the ninth to sixth centuries before Christ, Israelites used Egyptian numerals mingled with Hebrew text. The Papyrus Amherst 63 contains a text of Psalms 20:2-6 written in Aramaic (the language of Jesus) using Egyptian characters. This text was originally dated to the second century B.C., but this has since been extended to the 4th century B.C.		\|summary=Some claim that Jews or Israelites (like the Nephites) would not have used the language of their slave period — Egyptian — to write sacred records, that there is no evidence in Egyptology of something called "reformed Egyptian," and that the Book of Mormon's claim to have been written in this language is therefore suspect. However, the claim that Israelites would not use Egyptian is clearly false. By the ninth to sixth centuries before Christ, Israelites used Egyptian numerals mingled with Hebrew text. The Papyrus Amherst 63 contains a text of Psalms 20:2-6 written in Aramaic (the language of Jesus) using Egyptian characters. This text was originally dated to the second century B.C., but this has since been extended to the 4th century B.C.
	}}		}}
	{{SummaryItem		{{SummaryItem
	\|link=Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Language/Reformed Egyptian/Egyptian too bulky		\|link=Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Language/Reformed Egyptian/Egyptian too bulky
	\|subject=Egyptian would not be shorter than Hebrew on the plates		\|subject=Egyptian would not be shorter than Hebrew on the plates
	\|summary=~~Critics claim~~ that Egyptian would be too lengthy and bulky on the plates to account for the Book of Mormon [Egyptian would take] "perhaps four times, or even more than four times, as much room as the English, and it is quite certain that, as the Book of Mormon is 600 pages thick, it would take at least a thousand plates to hold in the Egyptian language, what is there written."		\|summary=It is claimed that Egyptian would be too lengthy and bulky on the plates to account for the Book of Mormon [Egyptian would take] "perhaps four times, or even more than four times, as much room as the English, and it is quite certain that, as the Book of Mormon is 600 pages thick, it would take at least a thousand plates to hold in the Egyptian language, what is there written."
	}}		}}

	[[fr:Topical Guide/Book of Mormon/Textual Issues/Reformed Egyptian]]		[[fr:Topical Guide/Book of Mormon/Textual Issues/Reformed Egyptian]]

RogerNicholson: mod

2013-10-10T02:01:47Z

mod

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:01, 10 October 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}		{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
	~~==FAIR Wiki Articles==~~		{{Resources}}

	{{SummaryItem		{{SummaryItem
Line 12:		Line 12:
	\|summary=Critics claim that Egyptian would be too lengthy and bulky on the plates to account for the Book of Mormon [Egyptian would take] "perhaps four times, or even more than four times, as much room as the English, and it is quite certain that, as the Book of Mormon is 600 pages thick, it would take at least a thousand plates to hold in the Egyptian language, what is there written."		\|summary=Critics claim that Egyptian would be too lengthy and bulky on the plates to account for the Book of Mormon [Egyptian would take] "perhaps four times, or even more than four times, as much room as the English, and it is quite certain that, as the Book of Mormon is 600 pages thick, it would take at least a thousand plates to hold in the Egyptian language, what is there written."
	}}		}}

	~~==FAIR Article==~~
	*{{tg\|url=http://www.fairlds.org/apol/ai091.html\|topic=Reformed Egyptian}}

	[[fr:Topical Guide/Book of Mormon/Textual Issues/Reformed Egyptian]]		[[fr:Topical Guide/Book of Mormon/Textual Issues/Reformed Egyptian]]

RogerNicholson: /* FAIR Wiki Articles */ links

2011-05-03T00:59:37Z

FAIR Wiki Articles: links

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:59, 3 May 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:

	{{SummaryItem		{{SummaryItem
	\|link=/Reformed Egyptian		\|link=Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Language/Reformed Egyptian
	\|subject=Reformed Egyptian		\|subject=Reformed Egyptian
	\|summary=Critics claim that Jews or Israelites (like the Nephites) would not have used the language of their slave period — Egyptian — to write sacred records, that there is no evidence in Egyptology of something called "reformed Egyptian," and that the Book of Mormon's claim to have been written in this language is therefore suspect. However, the claim that Israelites would not use Egyptian is clearly false. By the ninth to sixth centuries before Christ, Israelites used Egyptian numerals mingled with Hebrew text. The Papyrus Amherst 63 contains a text of Psalms 20:2-6 written in Aramaic (the language of Jesus) using Egyptian characters. This text was originally dated to the second century B.C., but this has since been extended to the 4th century B.C.		\|summary=Critics claim that Jews or Israelites (like the Nephites) would not have used the language of their slave period — Egyptian — to write sacred records, that there is no evidence in Egyptology of something called "reformed Egyptian," and that the Book of Mormon's claim to have been written in this language is therefore suspect. However, the claim that Israelites would not use Egyptian is clearly false. By the ninth to sixth centuries before Christ, Israelites used Egyptian numerals mingled with Hebrew text. The Papyrus Amherst 63 contains a text of Psalms 20:2-6 written in Aramaic (the language of Jesus) using Egyptian characters. This text was originally dated to the second century B.C., but this has since been extended to the 4th century B.C.
	}}		}}
	{{SummaryItem		{{SummaryItem
	\|link=/Reformed Egyptian/Egyptian too bulky		\|link=Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Language/Reformed Egyptian/Egyptian too bulky
	\|subject=Egyptian would not be shorter than Hebrew on the plates		\|subject=Egyptian would not be shorter than Hebrew on the plates
	\|summary=Critics claim that Egyptian would be too lengthy and bulky on the plates to account for the Book of Mormon [Egyptian would take] "perhaps four times, or even more than four times, as much room as the English, and it is quite certain that, as the Book of Mormon is 600 pages thick, it would take at least a thousand plates to hold in the Egyptian language, what is there written."		\|summary=Critics claim that Egyptian would be too lengthy and bulky on the plates to account for the Book of Mormon [Egyptian would take] "perhaps four times, or even more than four times, as much room as the English, and it is quite certain that, as the Book of Mormon is 600 pages thick, it would take at least a thousand plates to hold in the Egyptian language, what is there written."

RogerNicholson: /* FAIR Wiki Articles */ mod

2011-05-03T00:58:22Z

FAIR Wiki Articles: mod

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 3 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}		{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
	==FAIR Wiki Articles==		==FAIR Wiki Articles==
	*[[Book of Mormon ~~anachronisms~~/Reformed Egyptian\|Book of Mormon ~~anachronisms—Reformed~~ Egyptian]]
			{{SummaryItem
			\|link=/Reformed Egyptian
			\|subject=Reformed Egyptian
			\|summary=Critics claim that Jews or Israelites (like the Nephites) would not have used the language of their slave period — Egyptian — to write sacred records, that there is no evidence in Egyptology of something called "reformed Egyptian," and that the Book of Mormon's claim to have been written in this language is therefore suspect. However, the claim that Israelites would not use Egyptian is clearly false. By the ninth to sixth centuries before Christ, Israelites used Egyptian numerals mingled with Hebrew text. The Papyrus Amherst 63 contains a text of Psalms 20:2-6 written in Aramaic (the language of Jesus) using Egyptian characters. This text was originally dated to the second century B.C., but this has since been extended to the 4th century B.C.
			}}
			{{SummaryItem
			\|link=/Reformed Egyptian/Egyptian too bulky
			\|subject=Egyptian would not be shorter than Hebrew on the plates
			\|summary=Critics claim that Egyptian would be too lengthy and bulky on the plates to account for the Book of Mormon [Egyptian would take] "perhaps four times, or even more than four times, as much room as the English, and it is quite certain that, as the Book of Mormon is 600 pages thick, it would take at least a thousand plates to hold in the Egyptian language, what is there written."
			}}

	==FAIR Article==		==FAIR Article==

GregSmithBot: GLSBot: Adding headers to all articles

2010-05-16T04:06:58Z

GLSBot: Adding headers to all articles

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:06, 16 May 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
	==FAIR Wiki Articles==		==FAIR Wiki Articles==
	*[[Book of Mormon anachronisms/Reformed Egyptian\|Book of Mormon anachronisms—Reformed Egyptian]]		*[[Book of Mormon anachronisms/Reformed Egyptian\|Book of Mormon anachronisms—Reformed Egyptian]]

GregSmith: robot Adding: fr:Topical Guide/Book of Mormon/Textual Issues/Reformed Egyptian

2010-05-03T07:46:58Z

robot Adding: fr:Topical Guide/Book of Mormon/Textual Issues/Reformed Egyptian

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:46, 3 May 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==FAIR Article==		==FAIR Article==
	*{{tg\|url=http://www.fairlds.org/apol/ai091.html\|topic=Reformed Egyptian}}		*{{tg\|url=http://www.fairlds.org/apol/ai091.html\|topic=Reformed Egyptian}}

			[[fr:Topical Guide/Book of Mormon/Textual Issues/Reformed Egyptian]]