Array

Communism and the United Order: Difference between revisions

m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-Source(s) of the criticism +{{Criticism source label English}}, -Source(s) of the Criticism +{{Criticism source label English}}, -==Criticism== +=={{Criticism label}}==, -==Response== +=={{Response label}}==, -==Qu)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{draft}}
{{draft}}


==Criticism==
=={{Criticism label}}==
Critics claim that the United Order was simply "communism."
Critics claim that the United Order was simply "communism."


===Source(s) of the criticism===
==={{Criticism source label English}}===
* {{CriticalWork:Denton:American Massacre|pages=9}}
* {{CriticalWork:Denton:American Massacre|pages=9}}
* {{CriticalWork:Tanner:Changing World|pages=59}}
* {{CriticalWork:Tanner:Changing World|pages=59}}


==Response==
=={{Response label}}==


The claim is absurd, and intended to be inflammatory.
The claim is absurd, and intended to be inflammatory.
Line 20: Line 20:
* private ownership versus no private ownership.
* private ownership versus no private ownership.


==Endnotes==
=={{Endnotes label}}==
''None''
''None''


[[fr:Communism and the United Order]]
[[fr:Communism and the United Order]]

Revision as of 08:33, 4 May 2010

This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.

==

Questions

== Critics claim that the United Order was simply "communism."

Source(s) of the criticism

==

Detailed Analysis

==

The claim is absurd, and intended to be inflammatory.

Marx and Engel's Communist Manifesto was not written until 1848, so it would be impossible for Joseph Smith to draw on their ideas.

There are many differences between the United Order and Marxist Communism, including:

  • voluntary versus involuntary.
  • focused on God and Christ versus atheistic.
  • private ownership versus no private ownership.

== Notes == None